As the college football season heats up, a growing debate has emerged about the perceived differences in how Ohio State and Georgia are treated in the race for the College Football Playoff (CFP). Critics argue that Ohio State has received special treatment compared to the defending national champions, raising questions about fairness and consistency in the selection process.
Ohio State, a perennial powerhouse, has long been viewed as a media darling, receiving significant attention from analysts, pollsters, and the CFP committee. Despite some early-season struggles, the Buckeyes have often found themselves ranked highly, with their marquee wins being heavily emphasized. This contrast to Georgia’s more measured recognition has led some to wonder if the Buckeyes’ history and fanbase are giving them an edge.
On the other hand, Georgia has dominated the college football landscape in recent years, boasting a stacked roster and an almost flawless record. Yet, despite their success, the Bulldogs haven’t always received the same level of national attention or hype as Ohio State, even when their performance clearly warrants it. Georgia’s methodical, defense-first style doesn’t always produce the flashy headlines that Ohio State’s high-scoring offense does, possibly leading to a discrepancy in how each team is viewed.
The criticism revolves around the inconsistency in ranking and how both teams’ schedules are analyzed. While Ohio State’s non-conference schedule has been scrutinized in past years, Georgia’s tougher SEC slate often seems to be overlooked in favor of Ohio State’s spotlight games.
As the playoff race intensifies, fans and analysts alike will be watching closely to see whether Ohio State continues to benefit from its historical reputation, or if Georgia’s dominance will finally receive the recognition it deserves.
