Alabama’s playoff snub ultimately falls on the Crimson Tide themselves. While debates about strength of schedule will continue, the reality is that a program of Alabama’s caliber should never be in a position where its playoff hopes hinge on the outcome of the ACC Championship Game. Losses to Vanderbilt and Oklahoma were significant setbacks, especially when compared to SMU’s record. The Mustangs had better losses and didn’t suffer a blowout like Alabama did in Norman.
Entering the Oklahoma game, Alabama controlled its own destiny. Winning out would have guaranteed a spot in the SEC Championship in Atlanta. Even if they had lost to Texas, the way this committee handled championship game losers suggests Alabama would still have made the playoff. Some might argue that playing tough non-conference schedules seems futile when teams with weaker schedules are making the playoff. However, teams like Arizona State and Boise State capitalized on their opportunities, improving in November and winning their conference titles.
When compared to SMU, the committee made the right decision under the circumstances. SMU’s narrow loss to Clemson—a game they nearly forced into overtime—was more impressive than anything Alabama did after the LSU game. This should serve as a wake-up call for Alabama’s coaching staff and players to win the games they’re expected to and avoid leaving their postseason fate in the hands of others.
